Magnetoelectric network: acute pig spinal stimulation, 2025
Lab or organization
No atlas brief linked yet.
Wireless spinal network in pigs
The 2025 paper tests magnetoelectric spinal IPGs in two acute experiments with female Yucatan minipigs, both 3 months old, weighing 20.6 and 21 kg. This is stimulation-induced muscle recruitment under anesthesia, not restored independent walking or a clinical pain-treatment result.
Surgery and node count
After an L6 laminectomy, commercial Infinion 16-contact leads were placed in the dorsal epidural space between L4/L5 and sutured. Each wireless IPG connected to a pair of contacts and sat in a subcutaneous pocket. The first pig received two devices; the second received four. The incision accommodated only up to four of the six bench devices.
Six fabricated IPGs, 12 LED nodes and six-film power tests are separate experiments. They do not enlarge this animal network or cohort.
Stimulation response
The first experiment used 5-V pulses and showed selective proximal/distal muscle activation with sequential commands and combined activation with synchronous commands. The second used 13.75 V on four nodes and produced distinguishable activity patterns across recorded hindlimb muscles. The authors used wavelet decomposition and principal-component analysis to distinguish four response clusters.
Thresholds were much higher in the second experiment. The paper attributes this to factors such as lead-to-spinal-cord distance, not proof that every placement will recruit the same motor pools at 5 V. IPG programmability and voltage compliance help accommodate this variation; they do not remove it.
Measurements and artifacts
The system recorded external EMG. Figure 3’s high-frequency signals before stimulation are noise induced when the transmitter turns on/off to encode commands. Three repeated trials and their mean are plotted for each response; these are not three pigs per condition. The lead/contact count is not a sorted-neuron count.
Follow-up boundary
These acute experiments do not supply a chronic implanted survival curve, human benefit or long-term vascular/epidural safety. The cardiac pacing experiments are a distinct configuration and cohort, not extra spinal outcomes. Distributed sensing, neural uplink and real-time closed-loop algorithms remain future work.
Primary sources
- Published primary paper.
- Full primary manuscript,Figure3,spinal Results and acute spinal Methods.