Devices

High-density surface recordings of speech cortex in a person with severe limb and vocal paralysis, decoded in real time into text, synthesized speech and a facial avatar. Nature, August 2023.

Device — Cortical surface

UCSF speech neuroprosthesis (Metzger, 2023)

speech · ECoG · neuroprosthesis · avatar · deep learning · paralysis · UCSF · academic · human

UCSF speech neuroprosthesis (Metzger, 2023)

One-line verdict: A surface array over speech cortex, not a penetrating one, decoded attempted silent speech at 78 words per minute. It is the benchmark most speech BCIs get compared against.

Quick tags: Recording · Cortical surface · Human · Published 23 August 2023 (Nature)


Overview

What it is: A speech neuroprosthesis built on high-density surface recordings of the speech cortex, in one clinical-trial participant with severe limb and vocal paralysis.

What was shown: Real-time decoding across three outputs: text, speech audio and facial-avatar animation. Models were trained on neural data collected as the participant attempted to silently speak sentences.

  • Text: median 78 words per minute, median word error rate 25%, with a large vocabulary.
  • Speech audio: intelligible, rapid synthesis, personalized to the participant’s pre-injury voice.
  • Avatar: virtual orofacial movements for speech and non-speech communicative gestures.
  • The decoders reached high performance with less than two weeks of training.

Limits: One participant. The abstract does not give the electrode count or array geometry, so none is stated here. An Author Correction was published on 4 July 2024.


Spec Card Grid

Identity

  • Paper: “A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control,” Nature, 23 August 2023
  • Participant: one person, severe limb and vocal paralysis

Results (as reported)

  • Text rate: 78 words per minute (median)
  • Word error rate: 25% (median)
  • Training time: under two weeks
  • Outputs: text, speech audio, facial avatar

Evidence and limits

  • Not covered here: array dimensions and channel count; no 3D model yet
  • Compare with: intracortical speech work such as the Paradromics trial

References